Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 29 March 2012 21:05, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Barring objections I'll go fix this, and then this patch can be >> considered closed except for possible future tweaking of the >> sticky-entry decay rule.
> Attached patch fixes a bug, and tweaks sticky-entry decay. Applied with some cosmetic adjustments. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers