Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Here is what I know and what comes to my mind right now:
> 1. anything but INSTEAD rules are unsafe
How so? I agree that volatile functions are problematic, but unless
there's one of those in the picture I think rules work pretty much as
documented.
> 3. the snapshots behaviour of an expanded statement is a bit confusing if it
> contains multiple statements which causes problems with the rather frequent
> attempts to build rules with upsert'is behaviour
Again, not sure what you're complaining about here.
> A very trivial, seemingly innocuous, but totally broken usage of rules:
The problem illustrated here is all down to nextval() being volatile,
no?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
