On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Well, FWIW I vote for making the new columns be float8 msec. > >> Ugh. So the three ways of doing timing that we have already aren't >> enough, and we need a fourth one? Ack! > > Huh? I understood what you said upthread to be that we have two ways > in existing releases (anything unreleased has zero standing in this > discussion): float8 sec in pg_stat_statements.total_time, and > int8 msec everywhere else. Did I miss something?
We also have int8 usec floating around. But even if we didn't, float8 msec would be a new one, regardless of whether it would be third or fourth... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
