On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 23:12 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> But there is also a flip side to that, namely that if we do so, there
> ought to be some aspect to the process to help guide those items that
> *aren't* particularly close to being committable.
I have benefited immensely from review of my WIP patches, and a lot of
the serious review tends to happen during commitfests. This is most
important for features with a significant user interface, where it's
harder to guess what people will want.
My current strategy is to submit WIP-marked patches during a commitfest.
I agree that we should continue to have a mechanism to review patches
that aren't ready for commit, though I'm fine if we change it.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
