-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> If the feature set is desirable, though, I wonder if Postgres is > big/high profile enough for them to figure out some sort of better > arrangement. They *love* it when big open-source projects use GitHub > as their public repo - they'll email and blog announcements about > it - and if there's interest I'd be happy to open a conversation > with them. No need to wonder, we've been in contact with them before and they are very pro Postgres. > I've looked at it in conjunction with Jenkins CI; it looked nice but was way > too heavy-weight for a four-person startup (what's code review?). It's > probably much more suitable for this sized project. > Gerrit's a full-featured code review app with a tolerable UI; MediaWiki is just starting to jump into git/Gerrit and there are definitely a lot of rough edges in that workflow still. ... Someone mentioned upthread that github spam was a problem. I'm not sure I see the issue here - wouldn't mail from them still go through our lists and out current anti-spam measures anyway? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204170623 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk+NRO4ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshPpACg9+ZB6NzCsvnkQwuoD/BzIHgL yMkAn3zwksbKxaSDt3k/YzKY7UVLmUZb =igZu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
