Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Until we have folks who are excited enough about it to plan it out and > do the work, piecemeal rejection of components is not leading to a more > solid product.
I'm lukewarm about whether to actually do the split or not ... but for sure I agree with Thomas' point here. We need a plan and careful implementation, or a split-up will just make life worse. Stuff that is in the tree tends to get maintained in passing. For example, I've got some changes to contrib/dblink/ in my in-progress version of Chris' DROP COLUMN patch, because a grep for references to rel->rd_att turned it up. If dblink weren't in our CVS it'd have been broken by DROP COLUMN, and who knows whether we'd catch that during beta? I realize that Marc wasn't proposing splitting off any server-side code, but I still want to tread carefully about breaking up the codebase. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]