"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Um, that is what the proposed patch does.
> I was referring to the first two lines that the patch removes. > I guess I don't understand why they should go. What we'd have left after the proposed removal is if (new_path->rows < old_path->rows) remove_old = true; /* new dominates old */ else accept_new = false; /* old equals or dominates new */ There's no need to make more than one test on the rows values. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers