On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Let's not go looking for reasons to >> reject the approach just because we didn't expect it to work as well >> as it does. > > Who here, in your opinion, is looking for reasons to reject anything?
I'm just saying that there seems to be a bit more skepticism here than can be justified considering that the test results are all on one side. It wouldn't take a lot of evidence to convince me that this is a bad idea, but it will take more than none, which is the amount we have now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
