On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2 May 2012 04:57, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> FWIW, I think only developers not packagers would really be taking such >> a hit. I assume we'd continue to ship prebuilt lexer output in >> tarballs, so there'd seldom be a reason for a packager to need to run >> the tool. Given the extremely slow rate of churn of the lexer, it might >> not be necessary for most developers to have the tool installed, either, >> if we were willing to put the derived file into git. > > Incidentally, I had an unrelated conversation with someone (I think it > might have been Heikki) a while back, where it was suggested that Flex > and Bison could be run through web services. This might actually make
Might've been me - I've been doing that for a long time to work around winflex issues. But I never got around to doing anything like access control or so, I just ran it on a hidden ip on a random port, and simple curl call on the windows box.. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
