On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > It seems pretty confusing that synchronous_commit = 'remote_write' means > write confirmed to the remote socket, not write to the file system. Is > there no better term we could some up with? remote_pipe? > remote_transfer?
remote_accept? And then, I could envision (if it continues down this road): off local remote_accept remote_write remote_sync remote_apply (implies visible to new connections on the standby) Not saying all off these are necessarily worth it, but they are all the various "stages" of WAL processing on the remote... -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, ai...@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
