On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Argh. This thread appears to have been forgotten - sorry about that. >> >> Given that we're taling about a potential protocol change, we really >> should resolve this before we wrap beta, no? > > Had a chat with Heikki about this, and we came to the conslusion that > we don't actually have to fix it befor ebeta. Because pg_basebackup is > going to have to consider 9.1 servers anyway, and we can just treat > 9.2beta1 as being a 9.1 from this perspective. > > We still have to fix it, but it' snot as urgent :-) > > FWIW, the main plan we're onto is still to add the GUCs on new > connections to walsender, so we have something to work with...
And taking this a step further - we *already* send these GUCs. Previous references to us not doing that were incorrect :-) So this should be a much easier fix than we thought. And can be done entirely in pg_basebackup, meaning we don't need to worry about beta... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
