On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:46:20AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>I don't think 5 minutes is anywhere near necessary even for the docs, > >>but there is a lot of room between 5 minutes and 4 hours, so we can > >>definitely shorten it. > >Do you want me to just setup a build on my machine like we did before; > >5 minutes is no problem for me. > > > >I use the doc build to show patch submitters what their final work looks > >like, and anything more than a few minutes delay makes that useless. > > > > It's been done the current way for quite a few months now. If you're > only noticing it now is it really such an inconvenience? Having said > that, I'm not at all opposed to reducing the lag time.
Well, I am not applying doc patches much anymore; my point is that the first time I actually need to send out a URL of the docs, it wasn't sufficient for me. Yes, I can work around it, but it that what we want everyone to do? I don't remember this change being discussed anywhere I see. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
