Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > The problem is that people think that "ISO" means ISO 8601, whereas it > actually means ISO 9075. I can see how that's an easy mistake to make, > though.
... especially since we keep referring to 8601 in our own docs. Does this mean we should do a global s/8601/9075/ in the docs? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers