Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> The problem is that people think that "ISO" means ISO 8601, whereas it
> actually means ISO 9075.  I can see how that's an easy mistake to make,
> though.

... especially since we keep referring to 8601 in our own docs.
Does this mean we should do a global s/8601/9075/ in the docs?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to