On mån, 2012-05-21 at 13:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > ... but having said that, I see Peter's commit > > d6de43099ac0bddb4b1da40088487616da892164 only touched postgres.c's > > quickdie(), and not all the *other* background processes with > identical > > coding. That seems a clear oversight, so I will go fix it. Doesn't > > explain why the archiver would get confused, though, since that file > > doesn't have any code that tries to re-enable signals after entering > the > > signal handler. > > ... wait, scratch that. AFAICS, that commit was totally useless, > because BlockSig should always already contain SIGQUIT.
No, because PostgresMain() deletes it from BlockSig. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers