On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=16: > > > (average = 28.6 seconds) > > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=32: > > > (average = 29.15 seconds) > > That is almost a 2 percent cost. Shall we challenge someone to get us > back 2 percent from somewhere before the 7.3 release? Optimizing a hot > spot might do it...
The other side of the coin ... have you, in the past, gained enough performance to allow us a 2% slip for v7.3? Someone mentioned that the SQL spec called for a 128byte NAMELENTH ... is there similar for FUNC_MAX_ARGS that we aren't adhering to? Or is that one semi-arbitrary? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
