On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:19:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Regarding the item:
> >   * Properly handle empty arrays returned by PL/Perl functions (Andrew
> >     Dunstan) DETAILS?
> 
> > This was a bug fix, not a feature, and in any case is due to Alex 
> > Hunsaker, not me.
> 
> I assume this is in reference to these commits:

Thanks, removed from 9.2 release notes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> Author: Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>
> Branch: REL9_1_STABLE Release: REL9_1_0 [22a55b3af] 2011-08-17 12:03:26 -0400
> 
>     Properly handle empty arrays returned from plperl functions.
>     
>     Bug reported by David Wheeler, fix by Alex Hunsaker.
>     # Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
>     # with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts the commit.
>     # On branch master
>     # Changes to be committed:
>     #   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
>     #
>     # modified:   src/pl/plperl/plperl.c
>     #
>     # Untracked files:
>     #   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>     #
>     # autom4te.cache/
>     # configure.in~
>     # doc/src/sgml/ref/grant.sgml~
>     # src/backend/port/win32_latch.c~
>     # src/bin/psql/command.c~
>     # src/include/pg_config.h.win32~
>     # src/pl/plpython/plpython.c~
>     # src/tools/msvc/pgbison.bat~
>     # src/tools/msvc/pgbison.pl.bak
>     # src/tools/msvc/pgflex.bat~
>     # src/tools/msvc/pgflex.pl.bak
>     # src/tools/pgindent/README~
>     # src/tools/pgindent/pgindent.pl
>     # src/tools/pgindent/pgindent.pl~
>     # xxxxx
>     # yyyyyy
> 
> Author: Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>
> Branch: master [68c903a66] 2011-08-17 11:59:18 -0400
> 
>     Properly handle empty arrays returned from plperl functions.
>     
>     Bug reported by David Wheeler, fix by Alex Hunsaker.
> 
> git_changelog failed to merge them because of the different commit
> messages, which is probably why Bruce thought it was a HEAD-only
> commit.  AFAICS we should just remove this item, since it was (or
> should've been) documented already in 9.1 release notes.
> 
>                       regards, tom lane

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to