On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the walreceiver wakeups NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE=100 miliseconds in idle > state. This is rather frequent. I don't really see any reason to do so. > A nice fix would be to latchify that with WaitLatchOrSocket + a SetLatch in > the signal handler for shutdown but that seems to be too invasive at that > point. So I suggest simply increasing NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE to 500 or 1000ms?
Or calculate the sleep time from wal_receiver_status_interval in each cycle and use it? Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
