> > So, we only have to use shared buffer pool for local (but probably > > not for temporary) relations to close this issue, yes? I personally > > don't see any performance issues if we do this. > > Hmm. Temporary relations are a whole different story. > > It would be nice if updates on temp relations never got WAL-logged at > all, but I'm not sure how feasible that is. Right now we don't really
There is no any point to log them. > distinguish temp relations from ordinary ones --- in particular, they > have pg_class entries, which surely will get WAL-logged even if we > persuade the buffer manager not to do it for the data pages. Is that > a problem? Not sure. It was not about any problem. I just mean that local buffer pool still could be used for temporary relations if someone thinks that it has any sence, anyone? Vadim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
