On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Brar Piening <b...@gmx.de> wrote: >> The attached patch makes postgres build with Visual Studio 2012 RC. > > Looks good in principle - please add it to the next commitfest > (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=14). > We're definitely not adding a new build target post-beta for 9.2 :-) > > >> As MS finally decided on the name I don't expect any need for changes for >> the final RTM. >> >> I didn't bother to update the docs for now as I still have some hope that >> the developer community succeds in pushig M$ to reverse this decision: >> http://people.planetpostgresql.org/andrew/index.php?/archives/276-Microsoft-throws-large-developer-communities-under-the-bus.html > > We'll need docs by the time it should get committed of course - might > as well write up something based on what we know now, and then update > it if they change their behaviour. > > I don't have too much hope for them actually changing it - they seem > hell-bent on forcing everybody into metro, and this seems to be yet > another way to do that. But we can always hope...
Regardless, we should still add support for 2012 - we'll just need to note that Express cannot be used. FYI, we have to use Pro or higher to produce the installers as it is, otherwise we cannot distribute the runtimes. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers