On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I felt (and still feel) that this was misguided. > > Looking at it again, I'm inclined to agree. The behavior was entirely > correct up until somebody decided to emit a continuing stream of > XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS WAL records even when the system is idle. Why did > we not fix it by fixing that?
That's exactly what I think we should have done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
