Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> writes: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Um. We oughta fix that. I'm not necessarily wedded to the old >> throw-an-error definition, but there seems no good reason for these >> two syntaxes to act inconsistently. > > I agree with that. The URIs may have been done this way as a > concession to some small fragmentation that may have taken place > before URIs were standardized, but perhaps the author can speak to > that (he has been put on the To: list for this mail).
Sorry for the silence. The original intent was to not error out on any extra parameters from JDBC or other existing URI implementations. The example of a possible typo in sslmode=require clearly demonstrates that this was not a well-thought decision. Anyway, I can see you've already sorted this out. -- Alex -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers