On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> > Here's a patch implementing that restriction. To clarify, I see no need to >> > repeat *all* the CREATE-time checks; for example, there's no need to >> > recheck >> > permission to use the return type. The language usage check is enough. >> >> This seems bizarre and largely unnecessary. As you stated to begin >> with, granting ownership of a function implies some degree of trust. > > Yes, but I would never expect that level of trust to include access to crash > the server as a consequence of the function's reliance on STRICT.
+1. Crashes are bad. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
