>Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > If we had an independent way to have the function run as a > specific user, where that user DIDN'T own the function, I think > Kevin's use case would be satisfied. I agree. I'm not sure quite what that would look like, but maybe SECURITY ROLE <rolename> or some such could be an alternative to SECURITY INVOKER and SECURITY DEFINER. (I haven't looked to see what the standard has here.) -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
