On 18 June 2012 16:59, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Perhaps more importantly, I cannot recreate any of these problems on > my Fedora 16 machine. Even with hu_HU on LATIN2, Tom's original test > case (from 2005, on a Fedora 4 machine) cannot be recreated. So it may > be that they've tightened these things up in some way. It's far from > clear why that should be. > > It could be worth
Ugh, hit send too soon. I meant to close with the observation that it may be safe to rely on strcoll() / strxfrm() + strcmp() not ever returning 0 on certain platforms, if my inability to recreate this is anything to go by. There could be a test run by configure that determines this, enabling us to then use the strxfrm() optimisation. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
