Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What if I [try to] extend the grammar to support an additional ANALYZE > in CLUSTER, so that it analyzes the table automatically?
I don't like this -- it seems like bloat. What's the advantage of CLUSTER foo ON bar ANALYZE; over CLUSTER foo ON bar; ANALYZE; > Or maybe just do an analyze of the table automatically after the > CLUSTERing. Hmmm... I don't really see the problem with adding a note in the docs suggesting that users following a CLUSTER with an ANALYZE (of course, that assumes that the CLUSTER will significantly change the ordering of the data in the table, which isn't always the case -- which is another reason why make this automatic seems unwarranted, IMHO). It seems like you're looking for a solution to a non-existent problem. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
