On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Uh. I don't want to just go around and replace anything randomly. Actually I > don't want to change anything for now except whats necessary to get the patch > in. The point I tried to make was just that the relatively widespread usage of > similar structure make it likely that it can be used in more places in future.
Well, the question is for anywhere you might be thinking of using this: why not just use List? We do that in a lot of other places, and there's not much reason to event something new unless there is a problem with what we already have. I assume this is related to logical replication somehow, but it's not clear to me exactly what problem you hit doing this in the obvious way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
