On 21 June 2012 15:00, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 21 June 2012 08:30, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> Nonetheless, it would be a good idea to prune the TODO list regularly, >>> such as after a release. We used to do that a bit, not so much lately, >>> perhaps. But everyone is invited to contribute to that. > >> The idea is to remove contentious issues from the list, to avoid the >> waste of time. > > The thing is, a lot of stuff gets punted to the TODO list *because* > it's contentious, ie there's not consensus on what to do. If there > were consensus we might've just done it already. I'm not sure we want > to remove such entries, though perhaps somehow marking them as debatable > would be a good thing. > > There may well be stuff on the list that is no longer very relevant in > today's world, but somebody would have to go through it item by item > to decide which ones those are. I'm not volunteering.
<smiles> Understood I'll have a play. Maybe I should just go with the idea of "Simon's TODO List" - stuff I personally think is worth working on, and leave it at that. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
