Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I don't think we want to expose TrickFunctionCall2(). Not with that name,
>> anyway. Perhaps we should refactor the functions called this way,
>> range_adjacent, range_overlaps etc., to have internal counterparts that can
>> be called without FunctionCall(). Like:
> I like idea of replacing TrickFunctionCall2 with internal function. Do you
> think I should post a separate patch for existing GiST code?
+1 ... that was a pretty grotty hack, so let's get rid of it if we can.
It's still going to require some documentation though I think.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
