Ah doh - I thought it was catching it returning a boolean. I'll fix and resubmit.
Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Hackers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:26 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_reset() weirdness > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression > > failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix > > the regression test to exclude this function? > > > > AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group'; > > oid | proname > > ! ------+--------------- > > ! 2249 | pg_stat_reset > > ! (1 row) > > Likely because this is now in CVS: > > DATA(insert OID = 2249 ( record PGNSP PGUID 4 t p t \054 0 0 > oidin oidout i p f 0 -1 0 _null_ _null_ )); > #define RECORDOID 2249 > > The Oids conflict. > > Joe > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
