On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> I went ahead and committed this. >> >> I kinda think we should back-patch this into 9.2. It doesn't involve >> a catalog change, and would make the behavior consistent between the >> two releases, instead of changing in 9.1 and then changing again in >> 9.2. Thoughts? > > +1.
Three votes with no objections is good enough for me, so, done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
