Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> cases where people are modifying the wrong hba file. Can we show
>> the source text of the hba line?
> We don't currently keep the full source text around - but we certainly
> could do that if we wanted to.
If we're concerned about providing a message like this, I think it'd be
well worthwhile. We presumably would only store the active lines not
comment lines, so the extra memory space would be negligible in just
about any real use-case.
> I'm not sure how much it helps - usually, you're going to end up on a
> line that's completely irrelevant if you get the wrong hba file (e.g.
> a comment or a line that's not even in the file at all due to size).
Only if you count accurately, and aren't fooled into miscounting by the
expectation that you must arrive on a non-comment line. I don't buy the
"the editor can do it for you" argument either, at least not since
noticing that recent versions of emacs don't count lines the way I do.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
