On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 28 June 2012 22:22, Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> wrote: >> All in all, I don't think this can be a very productive discussion >> unless someone just pitches a equal or better name overall in terms of >> conciseness and descriptiveness. I'd rather optimize for those >> attributes. Old advice is old; that's the nature of the beast. > > Robert suggested wal_flush_delay, which does more accurately describe > what happens now.
Well, I learned something from reading this name, having not followed the mechanism too closely. I like it. -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
