On fre, 2012-06-29 at 17:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yes. The problem with trying to change that is that it's damned if > you do and damned if you don't: compilers that are aware that abort() > doesn't return will complain about unreachable code if we keep those > extra variable initializations, while those that are not so aware will > complain about uninitialized variables if we don't.
But my point was, there aren't any unused code warnings. None of the commonly used compilers issue any. I'd be interested to know if there is any recent C compiler supported by PostgreSQL that issues some kind of unused code warning under any circumstances, and see an example of that. Then we can determine whether there is an issue here. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
