On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Will do so. Not sure if I can finish it today though, I am in the midst of >> redoing the ilist and xlogreader patches. I guess tomorrow will suffice >> otherwise... > Ok, attached are two patches: > The first is the rebased version of the original patch with > WalSndWakeupProcess renamed to WalSndWakeupProcessRequests (seems clearer). > > The second changes WalSndWakeupRequest and WalSndWakeupProcessRequests into > macros as you requested before. I am not sure if its a good idea or not. > > Anything else?
I committed these with just a bit of cleanup. Sorry it took me a while to get back to this. I did run some more tests but found no regressions. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
