On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Nils Goroll <sl...@schokola.de> wrote: >> 3.1.7? > > Sorry, that was a typo. 9.1.3. > > Yes, I had mentioned the Version in my initial posting. This version is the > one > I need to work on as long as 9.2 is beta. > >> A major scalability bottleneck caused by spinlock contention was fixed >> in 9.2 - see commit b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4. I'm not >> sure that it's very meaningful to do performance testing on versions >> that are known to be out of date. > > Apparently I have not pointed this out clearly enough. Sorry.
You might try back-porting that one commit and see whether it fixes your problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
