On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov >> <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it >>> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes >>> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only >>> changes few lines of code. >>> >>> Any thoughts? > >> Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2? > > It's been like that all along, no?
Yeah, but it seems an awful lot like a bug. In fact... it's hard to imagine how it could be any more of a bug than this. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
