Excerpts from Christopher Browne's message of jue jul 05 12:10:09 -0400 2012:
> I wound up expanding the function arguments and using function + args > as the name. That leads to a risk of rather long names for functions, > but there aren't many other ways possible. Well, maybe not many, but you don't need many, only some. You could stringify the list of arguments and use a hash of the string. That's also unambiguous and the length is constrained, regardless of the number of args. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
