Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Mm. I still think we should drop it, because it's still a dangerous API
>> that's not necessary for the principal benefit of this feature.
> Yes, it is a secondary feature, but it fits the needs of the actual target
> audience of the single-row feature - various high-level wrappers of libpq.
> Also it is needed for high-performance situations, where the
> single-row-mode fits well even for C clients, except the
> advantage is negated by new malloc-per-row overhead.
Absolutely no evidence has been presented that there's any useful
performance gain to be had there. Moreover, if there were, we could
probably work a bit harder at making PGresult creation cheaper, rather
than having to expose a dangerous API.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
