On 07/19/2012 01:48 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On 07/19/2012 01:04 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I did a backport of temp_file_limit feature to 9.1, but when we tested
this patch, we found very restristrictive limit to 2GB.
2GB is nonsense, because this is session limit of temp files, and
these files should be longer than 2GB.
I haven't read the patch but... don't all 32bit platforms have a 2GB limit
(by default)?
I don't think so.
LFS got done in the mid-90s, which is long enough ago for people to
start forgetting about it. Are there any supported platforms that
didn't adopt LFS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support
Note: "by default" :). I know they could support LFS but as I recall you
had to compile specifically for it (at least on linux and old versions
of pg).
So I was curious if it was that specific limitation or a limitation
within the Pg code itself.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
