On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it> wrote: > Hi guys, > > it is time to give another go to this patch. I would like to thank > everyone for suggestions and ideas expressed through this list. > > We are happy that "Part 0" of the patch has been committed > (array_remove() and array_replace() functions), which will be useful in > "Part 2" (too early now to talk about it). Let's not rush though and focus > on "Part 1" of the patch. :) > > First, I would like to find a unique and general term for this feature. > We started with "Foreign keys with arrays" and ended up with "EACH foreign > keys". Following Peter's suggestion, we will use the "ELEMENT" keyword (so > that maybe in the future we can extend the usage). Our proposals are: > > * Array Foreign Key > * Foreign Key Arrays > * ELEMENT Foreign Keys > * ... > > Which one is your favourite?
I think having the word "element" in there makes it a lot clearer. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
