Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK, seeing as no one voted, and only Tom and I objected originally, we > > will keep the code as Thomas has applied it, namely that PGXLOG/-X is > > recognized by initdb, postmaster, postgres, and pg_ctl. > > We will? It looks to me like Thomas lost the vote 2-to-1. > > Unless there are more votes, I'm going to *insist* that this code be > changed. It's dangerous and offers no offsetting benefit. XLOG > location should be settable at initdb, noplace later.
Well, you didn't vote again in my follow up email, so I thought you didn't care anymore, and Thomas didn't reply to my email either. I am clearly concerned, as you are, but Thomas isn't, and no one else seems to care. Can two guys override another guy if he is doing the work? I usually like to have a larger margin than that. I don't know what to do. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
