On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I > >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all. Are we > >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin? That seems a > >> strange policy. > > > > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then. > > I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of > robustness that I'm not sanguine about. Granted, putting it in > contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than > is perhaps warranted. But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in > src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to > filing down the rough edges.
I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
