On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 23:09, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK, seeing as no one voted, and only Tom and I objected originally, we > > will keep the code as Thomas has applied it, namely that PGXLOG/-X is > > recognized by initdb, postmaster, postgres, and pg_ctl. > > We will? It looks to me like Thomas lost the vote 2-to-1. > > Unless there are more votes, I'm going to *insist* that this code be > changed. It's dangerous and offers no offsetting benefit. XLOG > location should be settable at initdb, noplace later. >
I think Tom is on to something here. I meant to ask but never got around to it. Why would anyone need to move the XLOG after you've inited the db? Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
