Having statistics on ranges was really missing! The planner was doing some really, really bad choices on bigger tables regarding seq/random scans, nested loop/other joins etc.
Is there any chance this makes it into 9.2 final? It would really round-off the introduction of range types and maybe avoid problems like "the new range types are slow" (just due to the bad row estimates). Thanks for implementing this feature, -Matthias -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
