On 08/07/2012 02:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
I did not commit the advanced.sgml changes.
That's arguably the most important point to raise this. The most recent question came from someone who actually bothered to RTFM and believed based on the advanced-transactions page that rollback rolls *everything* back.
Some kind of hint that there are execptions is IMO very important. I'm not sure what the best form for it to take is.
I am not sure I believe the assertion that any function or type with special transactional behavior will include a documentation mention.
It absolutely should, but I guess that doesn't mean it's guaranteed to.
It doesn't seem like a terribly future-proof assertion at any rate. With respect to the mention of autocommit, I think it would be good to add something there, but maybe it should cross-reference our existing documentation mentions of autocommit. Also, it's a bit ambiguous the way it's worded whether you get the automatic BEGIN/COMMIT with autocommit=on or with autocommit=off; somehow we should try to clarify what we mean a little more there.
Yeah. I should've kept that separate, as it was something I noticed in passing, rather than central to the changes.
-- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
