On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 09:26:41AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Did we ever decide on this? > > We discussed it to the point of consensus, and Tom wrote a patch to > implement that. Testing in my shop hit problems for which the cause > was not obvious. I don't know whether there is a flaw in the > designed approach that we all missed, a simple programming bug of > some sort in the patch, or pilot error on this end. It's on my list > of things to do, but it's hovering around 4th place on that list, > and new things seem to be appearing at the top of that list at about > the rate that I can clear them. :-( > > > Is it a TODO? > > We don't want to lose track of it, but with a pending patch to > debug, I'm not sure the TODO list is the right place to put it.
OK, I will let it linger on your TODO list then. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
