Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 14 August 2012 21:26, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't have
>> a microsecond specification.
> I think that if we eventually decide to change the name of
> commit_delay for 9.3 (you previously suggested that that might be
> revisited), it will be reasonable to have the new GUC in units of
> milliseconds.
Well, the reason why it's like that at all is the thought that values
of less than 1 millisecond might be useful. Are we prepared to suppose
that that is not and never will be true?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
