Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: > On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> which would come >> back to bite us if we ever try to support index-only scans with SPGiST.
> I'm confused: > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=92203624934095163f8b57b5b3d7bbd2645da2c8 Sorry, I was being imprecise there. What I meant was that an opclass that abused the reconstructed-value storage for something else might have problems supporting index-only scans. If we think opclasses might need private storage for index searches, we should add that as a new part of the API, not tell them to misuse this part. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
