On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > A TODO for this?
You mean this part? >> On the other hand, the problem of the FSM taking up 24kB for an 8kB >> table seems clearly worth fixing, but I don't think I have the cycles >> for it at present. Maybe a TODO is in order. I certainly think that'd be worth a TODO. Whether the rest of this is worth worrying about I'm not sure. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
