On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ago 20 11:43:44 -0400 2012: >> I actually think we'd probably be better off running pgrminclude once >> per release cycle rather than any less often. When the number of >> changes gets into the hundreds or thousands of lines it becomes much >> more difficult to validate that it's doing anything sensible. I ran >> it a while back and found a bunch of stuff that looked like it was >> obviously worth fixing, but I was afraid of getting yelled at if I >> went and fixed it, so I didn't. Somehow that doesn't seem like an >> ideal situation... > > Alternatively you could post a patch for comment.
Yeah, maybe I'll try that if I get back around to working on this at some point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
